Grade 10 · Reading & language

Notice gaps in an argument

Identify why a reason does not adequately support a conclusion.

8 authored questions + worked example

Worked example

Everyone in our group likes this explanation, so it must be correct.

What is the main reasoning problem?

Answer & why

Answer: It treats popularity as proof.

Many people choosing something does not establish that its claim is true.

Add to plan

All questions

All 8 authored questions for this skill.

Question 1

They asked for a one-day trial, so they clearly want us to change everything forever.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It attacks the person instead of the idea.
  2. It exaggerates the opposing position.
  3. It treats popularity as proof.
  4. It changes the subject.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It exaggerates the opposing position.

Wanting a short trial is changed into an unsupported permanent demand.

Add to plan

Question 2

When asked whether the path is accessible, the organizer replies that the flowers are attractive.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It attacks the person instead of the idea.
  2. It treats popularity as proof.
  3. It draws a broad conclusion from too little evidence.
  4. It changes the subject.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It changes the subject.

The response does not address the path's accessibility.

Add to plan

Question 3

Everyone in our group likes this explanation, so it must be correct.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It draws a broad conclusion from too little evidence.
  2. It attacks the person instead of the idea.
  3. It offers only two choices when others may exist.
  4. It treats popularity as proof.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It treats popularity as proof.

Many people choosing something does not establish that its claim is true.

Add to plan

Question 4

Do not consider Lee's timetable proposal; Lee has untidy handwriting.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It attacks the person instead of the idea.
  2. It offers only two choices when others may exist.
  3. It assumes sequence alone proves causation.
  4. It draws a broad conclusion from too little evidence.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It attacks the person instead of the idea.

The statement judges the speaker rather than examining the proposal.

Add to plan

Question 5

Two visitors disliked the display, so nobody will enjoy it.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It offers only two choices when others may exist.
  2. It assumes sequence alone proves causation.
  3. It repeats the claim as its own evidence.
  4. It draws a broad conclusion from too little evidence.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It draws a broad conclusion from too little evidence.

Two observations cannot justify a claim about every visitor.

Add to plan

Question 6

We must cancel the event or spend our whole budget. There is no other option.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It repeats the claim as its own evidence.
  2. It offers only two choices when others may exist.
  3. It assumes sequence alone proves causation.
  4. It exaggerates the opposing position.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It offers only two choices when others may exist.

The statement excludes alternatives without showing they are impossible.

Add to plan

Question 7

The lights flickered after I moved my chair, so moving my chair caused the flicker.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It repeats the claim as its own evidence.
  2. It changes the subject.
  3. It exaggerates the opposing position.
  4. It assumes sequence alone proves causation.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It assumes sequence alone proves causation.

One event following another does not by itself prove a cause.

Add to plan

Question 8

This plan is best because no plan is better than this one.

What is the main reasoning problem?

  1. It exaggerates the opposing position.
  2. It treats popularity as proof.
  3. It changes the subject.
  4. It repeats the claim as its own evidence.
A hint

Separate the conclusion from its evidence and check whether the evidence actually supports it.

Answer & why

Answer: It repeats the claim as its own evidence.

The reason supplies no independent support.

Add to plan