Worked example
A town opens a bridge in 1900 and its trade rises in 1902. What does the order alone establish?
Answer & why
Answer: The bridge opened before the recorded rise.
The dates establish sequence, not a unique cause.
Grade 7 · Social studies
Distinguish chronological order, a proposed mechanism and evidence needed for a causal claim.
6 authored questions + worked example

Answer: The bridge opened before the recorded rise.
The dates establish sequence, not a unique cause.
All 6 authored questions for this skill.
Question 1
An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.
Answer: The railway as another possible influence.
The additional transport change could also affect visits.
Question 2
An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.
Answer: To examine whether visits changed differently under the stated conditions.
A comparison can inform a causal argument while remaining sensitive to other differences.
Question 3
An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.
Answer: Which production steps depended on that machine.
A dependency explains how the breakdown could affect production.
Question 4
An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.
Answer: It allows more than one influence and signals limited certainty.
The wording matches a multi-cause explanation rather than overstating the evidence.
Question 5
An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.
Answer: The bridge opened before the recorded rise.
The dates establish sequence, not a unique cause.
Question 6
An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.
Answer: Comparable travel-time records before and after the road.
The mechanism specifically depends on a change in travel time.