Grade 7 · Social studies

Separate sequence from historical cause

Distinguish chronological order, a proposed mechanism and evidence needed for a causal claim.

6 authored questions + worked example

Worked example

A town opens a bridge in 1900 and its trade rises in 1902. What does the order alone establish?

Answer & why

Answer: The bridge opened before the recorded rise.

The dates establish sequence, not a unique cause.

Add to plan

All questions

All 6 authored questions for this skill.

Question 1

Market visits rose after a road opened, but a railway also began service that month. What should the explanation consider?

  1. That chronology guarantees one cause.
  2. That simultaneous changes can never matter.
  3. That the road's name proves its effect.
  4. The railway as another possible influence.
A hint

An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.

Answer & why

Answer: The railway as another possible influence.

The additional transport change could also affect visits.

Add to plan

Question 2

Two similar towns have records for the same years. One gains a road and one does not. Why might a researcher compare them?

  1. To avoid checking any other condition.
  2. To prove every difference has one cause.
  3. To examine whether visits changed differently under the stated conditions.
  4. To replace all records with a guess.
A hint

An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.

Answer & why

Answer: To examine whether visits changed differently under the stated conditions.

A comparison can inform a causal argument while remaining sensitive to other differences.

Add to plan

Question 3

A factory log says a machine broke on Tuesday; output fell on Wednesday. Which extra detail would most directly connect the breakdown to output?

  1. An unrelated festival's poster.
  2. The length of the logbook title.
  3. Which production steps depended on that machine.
  4. The office's curtain color.
A hint

An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.

Answer & why

Answer: Which production steps depended on that machine.

A dependency explains how the breakdown could affect production.

Add to plan

Question 4

A historian writes, 'The records suggest the road contributed, alongside other changes.' What is appropriate about this claim?

  1. It treats suggestion as final proof.
  2. It allows more than one influence and signals limited certainty.
  3. It claims the road was the sole cause.
  4. It says no records were used.
A hint

An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.

Answer & why

Answer: It allows more than one influence and signals limited certainty.

The wording matches a multi-cause explanation rather than overstating the evidence.

Add to plan

Question 5

A town opens a bridge in 1900 and its trade rises in 1902. What does the order alone establish?

  1. The bridge opened before the recorded rise.
  2. No other change occurred.
  3. The bridge was the only possible cause.
  4. Trade rose before the bridge opened.
A hint

An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.

Answer & why

Answer: The bridge opened before the recorded rise.

The dates establish sequence, not a unique cause.

Add to plan

Question 6

A claim says a new road increased market visits because travel became faster. Which evidence addresses the proposed mechanism most directly?

  1. The number of letters in the road's name.
  2. A drawing of a market with no date.
  3. Comparable travel-time records before and after the road.
  4. The mayor's favorite color.
A hint

An earlier event may be relevant, but happening first does not by itself prove it caused what followed.

Answer & why

Answer: Comparable travel-time records before and after the road.

The mechanism specifically depends on a change in travel time.

Add to plan