Grade 12 · Social studies

Build a qualified historical synthesis

Integrate evidence with different scopes, origins and uncertainties into a conclusion no broader than the sources support.

6 authored questions + worked example

Worked example

A budget shows a hall was funded; a dated photograph shows its opening; neither records daily attendance. Which synthesis is supported?

Answer & why

Answer: The hall was funded and opened, but daily attendance is not established.

The sources establish funding and opening while leaving attendance unmeasured.

Add to plan

All questions

All 6 authored questions for this skill.

Question 1

A speech advocates a project; a private letter questions its cost. Which synthesis preserves both sources?

  1. The two documents must describe different projects.
  2. Every person opposed the project.
  3. The project had public advocacy and at least one recorded cost concern.
  4. Nobody questioned the project.
A hint

Preserve agreements, differences and missing evidence instead of forcing every source into one simple story.

Answer & why

Answer: The project had public advocacy and at least one recorded cost concern.

The stated evidence shows advocacy and a particular concern, not unanimous opinion.

Add to plan

Question 2

A historian's claim covers all villages, but surviving records come from two coastal settlements. What qualification is needed?

  1. Remove all place names and keep the universal claim.
  2. Limit the conclusion to the documented places or acknowledge the coverage gap.
  3. Treat missing records as proof of agreement.
  4. Assume inland villages were identical.
A hint

Preserve agreements, differences and missing evidence instead of forcing every source into one simple story.

Answer & why

Answer: Limit the conclusion to the documented places or acknowledge the coverage gap.

The evidence's geographic scope does not establish every village's experience.

Add to plan

Question 3

An account quotes three newspapers, but all copied the same dispatch. What should a synthesis disclose?

  1. Copying makes the event impossible.
  2. There are three independent eyewitnesses by definition.
  3. Publication count proves universal agreement.
  4. The reports share one textual origin.
A hint

Preserve agreements, differences and missing evidence instead of forcing every source into one simple story.

Answer & why

Answer: The reports share one textual origin.

Source dependence changes how much independent corroboration is available.

Add to plan

Question 4

Newly found records contradict one detail of an existing interpretation. What is a sound next step?

  1. Assume new always means accurate.
  2. Ignore them because the interpretation is older.
  3. Evaluate the new records and revise the affected claim if warranted.
  4. Rewrite every unrelated fact without checking.
A hint

Preserve agreements, differences and missing evidence instead of forcing every source into one simple story.

Answer & why

Answer: Evaluate the new records and revise the affected claim if warranted.

Historical explanations can be revised through evaluation, rather than automatic acceptance or rejection, of new evidence.

Add to plan

Question 5

A budget shows a hall was funded; a dated photograph shows its opening; neither records daily attendance. Which synthesis is supported?

  1. Every resident attended daily.
  2. The hall was funded and opened, but daily attendance is not established.
  3. The hall was never opened.
  4. Funding proves all visitors liked it.
A hint

Preserve agreements, differences and missing evidence instead of forcing every source into one simple story.

Answer & why

Answer: The hall was funded and opened, but daily attendance is not established.

The sources establish funding and opening while leaving attendance unmeasured.

Add to plan

Question 6

Two independent logs agree on a ship's arrival date, while later memoirs disagree about the weather. What can a synthesis do?

  1. Treat all details as equally confirmed.
  2. Report the supported date and retain uncertainty about weather.
  3. Discard the date because any disagreement invalidates all evidence.
  4. Invent exact weather to remove uncertainty.
A hint

Preserve agreements, differences and missing evidence instead of forcing every source into one simple story.

Answer & why

Answer: Report the supported date and retain uncertainty about weather.

Evidence may support different parts of a narrative with different confidence.

Add to plan